compare-masters

Produce citation-backed comparative analyses of Buddhist masters, schools, doctrines with CBETA citations and divergence mapping.

199|43|Updated Apr 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tradecatlabs/fatecat --skill compare-masters-tradecatlabs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: compare-masters
Source: https://github.com/tradecatlabs/fatecat/tree/main/tools/reference-repos/github/Master-skill-main/prebuilt/compare
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tradecatlabs/fatecat --skill compare-masters-tradecatlabs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps users compare multiple Buddhist masters, schools, and perspectives in a structured way without collapsing different traditions into a single answer. It is designed to prevent sectarian ranking, fabricated dialogue, and unsupported doctrinal claims while still giving a useful side-by-side analysis.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-master comparison: Selects the most relevant 2-3 masters based on topic, explicit user preference, or classic doctrinal pairings.
  • Evidence-backed responses: Requires CBETA citations for every doctrinal claim and organizes answers around the cited sources.
  • Difference mapping: Produces a five-dimensional divergence radar, labeled disagreement types, shared ground, and historical background.
  • Safety guardrails: Blocks rankings, invented conversations, esoteric step-by-step instructions, and attainment judgments.
  • Use Case: A user asks how Zen and Pure Land differ, and the Skill returns a balanced comparison with citations, differences, common ground, and follow-up questions.

Quick Start

Ask for a cited comparison of two or three Buddhist masters on your topic, and specify any masters you want included.

Frequently Asked Questions about compare-masters

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I compare Buddhist masters without sectarian bias or fabricated dialogue?

To compare Buddhist masters without bias, you produce citation-backed doctrinal analyses while preventing rankings and unsupported claims. The system selects 2-3 relevant masters based on topic or classic doctrinal pairings.

What is the best way to compare Zen and Pure Land doctrinal differences?

The best way to compare Zen and Pure Land differences is generating a five-dimensional divergence radar with CBETA citations. This maps labeled disagreement types, shared ground, and historical background side-by-side.

Can I use CBETA citations for sectarian studies across Tibetan and Theravada traditions?

Yes, you can use CBETA citations for sectarian studies across Chinese, Tibetan, and Theravada traditions. Evidence-backed responses organize answers around cited sources to prevent unsupported doctrinal claims.

How do I map meditation approaches across different Buddhist schools?

To map meditation approaches across Buddhist schools, apply structured divergence analysis to historical contrasts. This yields a balanced comparison with differences, common ground, and follow-up questions.

What are the limitations of comparing Buddhist masters using automated doctrinal analysis?

Limitations of doctrinal analysis include safety guardrails that block attainment judgments and esoteric step-by-step instructions. It prevents sectarian ranking and invented conversations to avoid biased or fabricated comparisons.