competing-pr-triage

To decide which pull request to merge, you can triage competing branches by verifying changes against goal requirements and performing a file-level scope audit. This produces a structured report with a merge verdict and a concrete follow-up plan.

Comparing code diffs from parallel worktrees is best handled by systematically mapping changes to functional requirements and auditing non-functional aspects. This surfaces gaps between branches and provides a structured recommendation for which diff to adopt.

Reviewing multiple agent pull requests involves triaging competing branches to determine which should be adopted. The process maps changes to a goal's requirements, audits file-level scope, and outputs a branch recommendation with switch-and-follow-up instructions.

A pull request triage report for competing branches includes a functional requirements table, a file-level scope audit, non-functional aspects analysis, and a closing verdict. It also provides precise switch-and-follow-up instructions for next actions after selecting a winner.

Yes, you can use code review triage for multi-agent parallel branch scenarios where different branches solve the same goal. It is specifically designed to verify changes against requirements and provide a decision on merge or continuation.