competitors

Creates evidence-based competitor comparison and alternatives pages for the German and DACH market.

73|4|Updated Aug 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LOGIN-TB/claude-skills --skill competitors-login-tb
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: competitors
Source: https://github.com/LOGIN-TB/claude-skills/tree/main/skills/competitors
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LOGIN-TB/claude-skills --skill competitors-login-tb

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Writing competitor comparison, alternatives, and versus pages for the German and DACH market carries legal risk under § 6 UWG and often produces one-sided, unsourced marketing claims. This Skill structures the entire workflow so every factual statement is sourced, dated, symmetric, and legally conservative. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Statement and Source Ledger: Maintains a claim-by-claim evidence table with source URL, retrieval date, plan, country, and confidence level for every assertion. - Four Comparison Formats: Supports singular alternative pages, plural alternatives roundups, product-vs-competitor pages, and neutral competitor-vs-competitor comparisons, plus internal battlecards. - DACH Legal Guardrails: Applies § 6 UWG conservatively for Germany, separates Austria and Switzerland checks, and enforces disclosure of publisher, affiliate, and ownership relationships. - Use Case: A marketing team needs a "Competitor X-Alternative" page. The Skill produces a research brief with sourced claims, confirmed trade-offs, a symmetric fact table, and a draft explicitly marked as not approved for publication. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to create an evidence-based comparison page for your product versus a named competitor for the German market, including a sourced claims table and pricing as of a specific date.

Frequently Asked Questions about competitors

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a competitor comparison page that complies with German law?

Comparative advertising in Germany is assessed under § 6 UWG, which requires comparing only objectively verifiable, material, and typical features of products serving the same need. This Skill enforces symmetric criteria, sourced claims, and no disparagement, while noting it does not replace qualified legal review.

How do I create an alternatives page without biased rankings?

Define selection criteria from the buyer's task before reviewing results, apply them symmetrically, and disclose publisher ownership, affiliate, or sponsorship relationships. The Skill prohibits placing the publisher's own product first solely because of ownership.

What sources should I use for competitor pricing and feature claims?

Prioritize current official pricing, documentation, and changelog pages, then approved hands-on tests, then independent tests with disclosed methodology. Every claim needs an exact URL, retrieval date, plan, country, and currency recorded in the evidence ledger.

Does this Skill publish comparison pages automatically?

No. It produces drafts explicitly marked as not approved for publication. Publishing, live-site changes, account registrations, test purchases, and repository modifications all require separate explicit approval.

Can I use this for Austria and Switzerland, not just Germany?

Yes, but each country is checked separately. Germany is the labeled default assumption; Austrian and Swiss UWG rules, currency, tax, and plan availability must be verified independently rather than transferring German results.

What are the limitations of AI-generated competitor comparisons?

The Skill cannot guarantee legal admissibility, search rankings, or factual accuracy without verification. It does not perform automated data collection, bypass logins, or claim hands-on testing that never occurred; untested capabilities are labeled as such.