completeness-auditor

Verify completion artifacts contain at least five explicit pass items.

452|24|Updated Apr 26, 2026

Search Tags:#workflow #validation #audit #completeness #quality-assurance #artifact

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills --skill completeness-auditor

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: completeness-auditor
Source: https://github.com/zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/completeness-auditor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills --skill completeness-auditor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Every skill that proclaims completion must have a substantive audit artifact on disk, containing at least five explicit pass items. This ensures verifiability and prevents verbal claims from constituting completion within the independent audit layer.

Core Features & Use Cases

Validates the presence and content of required audit artifacts across the QA workflow.
Blocks progression when artifacts are missing, empty, or contain fewer than five explicit pass items, ensuring traceable repair paths.
Runs in parallel with the consistency-auditor and precedes the quality-assurance-auditor to enforce a robust audit chain.

Quick Start

Run the completeness-auditor to verify that each completion artifact exists and contains at least five explicit pass items.

Frequently Asked Questions about completeness-auditor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I verify audit artifacts for completed skills and ensure they are substantive?▼

To verify audit artifacts for completed skills, you need to check that each completion claim is backed by an on-disk artifact containing at least five explicit pass items. This process enforces presence, content standards, and recency against source changes.

What happens to my workflow validation if audit artifacts are missing or empty?▼

Workflow validation blocks progression when audit artifacts are missing, empty, or contain fewer than five explicit pass items. This ensures verifiability and prevents verbal claims from constituting completion within the independent audit layer.

How do I audit completeness across my QA pipeline and generate a report?▼

You can audit completeness across the pipeline by running a tool that verifies every completion claim against substantive on-disk artifacts. This process outputs a structured completeness_audit.md report detailing any missing or insufficient items.

Why does my completeness audit require at least five explicit pass items?▼

A completeness audit requires at least five explicit pass items to ensure that every completion claim is substantive and verifiable. This standard prevents verbal claims from constituting completion within the independent audit layer.

Can I run this completeness validation alongside other consistency checks?▼

Yes, this completeness validation runs in parallel with the consistency-auditor and precedes the quality-assurance-auditor. This sequence enforces a robust audit chain across the entire QA workflow.

What is the best way to enforce traceable repair paths for insufficient audit artifacts?▼

To enforce traceable repair paths, you should validate the presence and content of required audit artifacts across the QA workflow. Blocking progression when artifacts are missing or insufficient ensures all completion claims are traceable and backed on disk.