compliance-evidence-collector

Map code, config, and documentation components to support audits.

1|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/00PrabalK00/claude-skills --skill compliance-evidence-collector
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: compliance-evidence-collector
Source: https://github.com/00PrabalK00/claude-skills/tree/main/skills/compliance-evidence-collector
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/00PrabalK00/claude-skills --skill compliance-evidence-collector

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Collects and organizes code, configuration, documentation, and runtime signals to support audits and internal compliance reviews, reducing manual gathering time and ensuring traceability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Survey relevant files, configs, and runtime artifacts to identify important components and boundaries.
  • Map relationships, dependencies, or graph structures to explain how the system or corpus fits together.
  • Highlight missing links, risky assumptions, or ambiguous edges that affect understanding or change safety.
  • Return a concise map plus the next best checks or follow-up actions.

Quick Start

Run the evidence collector against your repository to generate a structured audit map and an actionable compliance plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about compliance-evidence-collector

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I collect compliance evidence for a regulatory audit?

To collect compliance evidence, survey relevant files, configs, and runtime artifacts to identify components and boundaries. This process maps dependencies across repositories and highlights missing links to ensure traceability during regulatory reviews.

What is an auditable evidence map and how does it work?

An auditable evidence map identifies and maps critical code, config, and documentation components to support audits. It works by enforcing explicit boundaries, returning a structured map, and surfacing high-risk areas for follow-up actions.

Can I use this to map dependencies across diverse project types?

Yes, you can map dependencies across diverse project types. The evidence collection process surveys relevant files and artifacts to explain how the system fits together and highlight risky assumptions affecting change safety.

What's the best way to identify compliance gaps in my codebase?

The best way to identify compliance gaps is to survey your repository and map relationships between critical components. This surfaces missing links, risky assumptions, and ambiguous edges that require remediation planning.

Does evidence collection work for internal controls testing?

Yes, evidence collection works for internal controls testing. It applies during regulatory reviews and remediation planning to organize code, configuration, and documentation components, reducing manual gathering time.