condition-based-waiting

Poll conditions with timeout handling to wait for state changes in async tests.

Updated Feb 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Khoiwall/be_vidify --skill condition-based-waiting-khoiwall
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: condition-based-waiting
Source: https://github.com/Khoiwall/be_vidify/tree/main/.opencode/skill/condition-based-waiting
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Khoiwall/be_vidify --skill condition-based-waiting-khoiwall

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Tests often suffer from race conditions, timing dependencies, and flaky outcomes due to arbitrary delays; this skill helps replace guesswork with condition polling to ensure actual state changes are waited for.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Wait for a condition to be true before continuing, reducing flaky tests.
  • Provide reusable utilities to wait for events, counts, and predicate matches across async operations.
  • Works with asynchronous workflows in tests and debugging sessions to stabilize execution.

Quick Start

Observe a trigger under test and wait for a defined condition to become true before proceeding.

Frequently Asked Questions about condition-based-waiting

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I eliminate flaky tests caused by race conditions and timing dependencies?

To eliminate flaky tests, you can use condition polling to wait for actual state changes instead of arbitrary delays. This ensures deterministic test outcomes by verifying predicate matches and event readiness across asynchronous flows.

What is the best way to wait for an asynchronous state change before continuing test execution?

The best way to wait for an asynchronous state change is implementing robust polling with timeout handling. This approach monitors state readiness and counts to ensure the test only proceeds when the defined condition is met.

Why does my test suite produce nondeterministic results during debugging sessions?

Test suites produce nondeterministic results due to timing dependencies and race conditions across asynchronous operations. Replacing fixed delays with condition polling stabilizes execution by waiting for actual state readiness.

Can I create reusable wait helpers for events and counts across async workflows?

Yes, you can create reusable wait helpers to wait for events, counts, and predicate matches across async operations. These utilities provide clear failure messaging to ensure deterministic outcomes when timing issues occur.

Does condition polling support timeout handling for asynchronous operations?

Yes, condition polling implements robust timeout handling for asynchronous operations. It monitors state changes and triggers clear failure messaging if the expected condition is not met within the specified timeframe.