conduct-business-research

Runs desk research by inventorying internal and external sources, grading source quality, and producing a gap list.

1|Updated Jul 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dineshrevunuru/SuperSkills --skill conduct-business-research-dineshrevunuru
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: conduct-business-research
Source: https://github.com/dineshrevunuru/SuperSkills/tree/main/conduct-business-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dineshrevunuru/SuperSkills --skill conduct-business-research-dineshrevunuru

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Teams often commission expensive primary research (interviews, surveys) to answer questions that existing reports, filings, or internal data already answer, or they cite weak vendor content as market fact. This Skill runs a disciplined desk/secondary research pass first: it anchors the work to a decision, inventories what is already known, grades every source on a quality ladder, and converts what remains unknown into a primary-research agenda. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Decision-anchored scoping: Forces a one-sentence decision anchor and 3-5 answerable research questions before any reading begins, with a declared timebox and recency window. - Source quality ladder: Grades sources into four tiers (primary data, named-methodology research, journalism, vendor content), chases claims to their origin, and requires triangulation for load-bearing claims. - Gap list as deliverable: Outputs an evidence inventory with per-question ANSWED/PARTIAL/OPEN status, then converts every open question into a gap entry with the cheapest method to close it. - Use Case: Before designing a voice-commerce concept for first-time internet users in India, run a one-day desk pass to confirm regional-language usage from regulator data, flag a vendor claim about voice preference as under-evidenced, and hand the resulting gaps to a research plan. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to run a desk research pass on your market or domain, anchored to a specific decision, and produce an evidence inventory plus a gap list before any primary research is planned.

Frequently Asked Questions about conduct-business-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I do desk research before starting user interviews?

Anchor the pass to a specific decision, write 3-5 research questions, then inventory internal sources (past reports, analytics, support tickets) before scanning external ones. Mark each question answered, partial, or open, and turn the open ones into a gap list that becomes the interview plan's agenda.

What is the difference between desk research and primary research?

Desk research synthesizes what already exists in documents and data; primary research generates new data through interviews, surveys, or tests. Desk research should always run first so primary studies only pay to answer questions that existing sources cannot.

How do I evaluate whether a market research source is credible?

Grade sources on a four-tier ladder: government statistics and peer-reviewed studies are citable as-is, named-methodology industry research is citable with caveats, journalism works for dated facts, and vendor content is leads only. Chase every claim to its origin and require two independent sources for load-bearing claims.

When should I not use desk research?

Skip it when the answer lives in a person's head rather than documents (use stakeholder interviews), when you need competitor usability teardowns (use competitive analysis), or when you need deep analytics interpretation. Desk research inventories documents and data only.

Why do market-size numbers from different sources conflict?

Conflicting TAM figures usually trace to different methodologies, definitions, or a single origin being recycled across articles. Treat any market-size number without a date, methodology, and identifiable origin as flagged, and treat the divergence itself as a finding worth investigating.