conferencia-processual

To check factual consistency and legal thesis coherence before filing, use a legal pleading review process that cross-checks case evidence and generates paragraph-level edit suggestions. This Skill verifies evidentiary alignment and flags inconsistencies in an editable DOCX output.

Yes, you can detect CCB and TED value discrepancies automatically. The review process cross-checks concrete fields like contract numbers, values, and dates, flagging divergences when present in the Portuguese civil litigation workflow.

To generate paragraph-level edit suggestions for a Word legal pleading, run a final review that produces a separate DOCX document containing ready-to-paste replacement text anchored to the previous paragraph for direct editing.

Yes, this legal pleading review validates the author's OAB number and UF against internal office rules. It also detects non-adapted template patterns by checking whether margins and templates match the required compliance standards.

The best way to perform a pre-filing conference is to run a process-wide compliance check that verifies factual and legal points, checks evidentiary alignment, and returns a traffic-light report plus an edit-ready DOCX file.

When using internal scripts for jurisprudence checking, the system relies on a jurisprudence vault lookup fallback and literal quote anchoring. It is designed for Portuguese civil litigation workflows and requires the input Word pleading to generate valid outputs.