consciousness-council

Multi-perspective deliberation reduces cognitive bias by structuring the evaluation of a decision across 12 distinct archetypes, such as the Contrarian and Ethicist, ensuring diverse viewpoints surface blind spots before synthesizing actionable recommendations.

The best way to structure complex strategy deliberation is using a phase-based workflow: summon council members, gather perspectives from archetypes like the Futurist and Strategist, and synthesize convergence notes, tensions, and actionable recommendations.

Yes, you can configure ethical dilemma evaluation with anonymous mode and devil's advocate prompts to challenge prevailing assumptions and surface tensions without attribution biases affecting the synthesized output.

You can add custom thinking styles alongside the 12 built-in archetypes, such as the Creator and Minimalist, to tailor the multi-agent council's perspective gathering and synthesis outputs for specific creative challenges.

Use quick mode for rapid team decision-making and deep rounds mode for complex organizational decisions requiring extended deliberation, allowing you to tailor the pace and depth of the archetype perspective gathering.