consistency-auditor

Cross-media consistency auditing checks tex, code, results, data, and appendix files to identify divergences between claims and canonical sources across five dimensions: numbers, file names, symbols, parameters, and decision provenance.

Cross-media inconsistency occurs when numerical claims, figure references, symbols, or parameters in a paper draft diverge from canonical sources in the code, data, or appendix. An independent audit layer traces these mismatches to flag blocking divergences for repair.

Tracing numbers and parameters applies an audit across all subquestions and repository artifacts to enforce traceability from every judgment to DECIDED records, surfacing divergences where claims do not match canonical sources for repair.

Run a consistency audit after drafting sections to identify divergences between claims and canonical sources. It operates as an independent verification layer that does not trust any single skill's self-declaration of done, ensuring final assembly is not blocked.

The cross-media audit operates as an independent layer that does not trust any single skill's self-declaration of done. It independently verifies numbers, symbols, parameters, and decision provenance across tex, code, and data files to enforce traceability.

Cross-media consistency auditing limits its scope to five dimensions—numbers, file names, symbols, parameters, and decision provenance—across tex, code, results, data, and appendix. It flags blocking divergences for repair but does not automatically resolve the mismatches.