constraint-action

Hard constraints are non-negotiable limits that cannot be violated; soft constraints are flexible guidelines. Identifying them early clarifies which requirements are absolute blockers versus trade-offs, preventing downstream rework when conflicts surface during planning or execution.

Extract constraints explicitly from compliance requirements, guardrails, and risk assessments, then translate them into actionable rules. Surfacing them upfront prevents violations in downstream actions and flags conflicts that need human decisions.

Conflicting constraints surface when hard limits clash or soft guidelines contradict. Classify each constraint's type and source, then surface conflicts to stakeholders immediately so decisions can be made before execution proceeds.

Yes. By identifying and classifying hard, soft, and unknown constraints upfront, you create guardrails that guide planning and execution decisions, preventing actions that violate non-negotiable requirements.

Constraints come from compliance rules, regulatory requirements, risk frameworks, stakeholder non-negotiables, and technical limits. Identifying their source helps classify their strength and ensures guardrails address the right scope.

Classify constraints as unknown when their enforcement level is unclear—neither explicitly hard nor confirmed soft. Unknown constraints require discovery and stakeholder clarification before guardrails can be reliably applied.