content-refinement-agent

Iteratively simulate peer review and revise LaTeX paper drafts with accept/revert control.

2|1|Updated Apr 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearch --skill content-refinement-agent-raja21068
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: content-refinement-agent
Source: https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearch/tree/main/skills/paper-pipeline/content-refinement-agent
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearch --skill content-refinement-agent-raja21068

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you turn an initial LaTeX paper draft into a stronger, publication-ready version by iteratively simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions while strictly enforcing accept/revert halt rules.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Simulated peer review: Generates structured strengths, weaknesses, questions, and axis scores using a reviewer rubric designed for conservative feedback.
  • Targeted LaTeX revisions: Applies revisions guided by a verbatim Content Refinement Agent prompt while integrating reviewer questions into the manuscript text.
  • Execution-grounded iteration control: Snapshots each iteration, recompiles with LaTeX, re-scores, and either accepts or reverts based on deterministic scoring/plateau logic to prevent score gaming.

Use case example: You have a draft in workspace/drafts/paper.tex and you want to improve scientific depth, technical execution, and evidence presentation by running 3 refinement iterations with real compile+score feedback, then promoting the best accepted snapshot to workspace/final/paper.tex.

Quick Start

Refine the current draft by delegating Step 5 when the orchestrator asks for peer-review-based content refinement, so it compiles each iteration, scores it, and promotes the best accepted snapshot.

Frequently Asked Questions about content-refinement-agent

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I iteratively peer review and improve a LaTeX research paper draft?

To iteratively peer review and improve a LaTeX research paper draft, this Skill simulates structured reviewer feedback, applies targeted content revisions, recompiles with latexmk, and uses deterministic scoring to accept or revert snapshots.

Can I enforce citation integrity and verify numeric claims when refining a scientific manuscript?

Yes, you can enforce citation integrity and verify numeric claims when refining a scientific manuscript by restricting additions to an allowed citation pool and checking all numeric claims against a provided experimental ground-truth log.

What is the best way to prevent score gaming during automated paper revisions?

The best way to prevent score gaming during automated paper revisions is to enforce deterministic accept or revert halt rules with early-stop behavior based on scoring plateaus after each LaTeX compilation iteration.

Does this peer review simulation work with arXiv-style manuscripts and conference guidelines?

Yes, this peer review simulation works with arXiv-style manuscripts and conference guidelines, applying targeted revisions guided by an experimental ground-truth log to strengthen scientific depth and technical execution.

How do I track changes across multiple iterations of scientific writing refinement?

To track changes across multiple iterations of scientific writing refinement, the Skill generates per-iteration review.json and score.json snapshots, allowing you to compare progress and promote the best accepted version to your final output.