control-framework-mapping

Map controls across security frameworks to generate coverage and gap analyses.

1|Updated Nov 29, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SSiertsema/claude-code-plugins --skill control-framework-mapping
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: control-framework-mapping
Source: https://github.com/SSiertsema/claude-code-plugins/tree/main/control-framework-mapping/skills/control-framework-mapping
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SSiertsema/claude-code-plugins --skill control-framework-mapping

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Consolidates and maps controls across multiple security frameworks to avoid duplicate work and support evidence-based assessments.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Framework coverage & gap analysis: generate per-framework mappings, surface missing controls, and reveal cross-framework coverage.
  • Evidence-driven mapping: reference real control IDs with supporting evidence types, not fabricated claims.
  • Maturity and reporting: provide a maturity view and export consolidated reports for audits and governance.
  • Diagram rendering: produce Mermaid diagrams with optional PNG exports to visualize coverage.

Use cases include mapping ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST CSF, and NIST 800-53 within a single inventory; performing gap analyses to prepare for external audits; consolidating controls to reduce duplication across frameworks.

Quick Start

Define the scope and target frameworks, then run the mapping to generate a unified control inventory with evidence-backed mappings.

Frequently Asked Questions about control-framework-mapping

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I map controls across multiple security frameworks like ISO 27001 and SOC 2?

Cross-framework control mapping consolidates overlapping requirements from ISO 27001, SOC 2, and NIST CSF into a single inventory. It identifies gaps, references real control IDs, and links supporting evidence to eliminate duplicate audit work across multiple standards.

What is the best way to perform a gap analysis for NIST 800-53 and PCI-DSS compliance?

The best way to perform a gap analysis for NIST 800-53 and PCI-DSS is to apply scoping against target frameworks to generate per-framework coverage reports, surface missing controls, and map evidence types to ensure readiness for external audits.

Can I use evidence-driven control mapping to prepare for HIPAA Security Rule audits?

Yes, evidence-driven control mapping applies to the HIPAA Security Rule by referencing real control IDs with supporting evidence types rather than fabricated claims, generating per-framework coverage and maturity scoring to support audit readiness.

Does cross-framework control consolidation support maturity scoring and diagram exports?

Cross-framework control consolidation supports maturity scoring and diagram exports by providing a maturity view of your unified inventory and rendering Mermaid diagrams with optional PNG exports to visualize framework coverage gaps.

When do I need unified control framework mapping for risk management?

You need unified control framework mapping for risk management when consolidating multiple frameworks like NIS2, CIS Controls, and NIST CSF to avoid duplicate work, reveal cross-framework coverage, and support evidence-based governance assessments.