conventional-git

Standardize Git commit messages using Conventional Commits v1.0.0 rules with the format type(scope): subject. This creates a clean, machine-readable history that enables automated changelog generation and accurate issue closing across GitHub and GitLab projects.

The conventional commit format uses type(scope): subject for the header, with specific rules for formatting the body, footers, and breaking changes. This structured format ensures reliable parsing by automation tooling for changelogs and issue tracking.

Name Git branches and worktrees using type/description patterns with issue numbers and lowercase-hyphen formatting. This standardization prevents local checkout leaks into remote history and keeps your repository history navigable.

Yes, conventional commit standardization applies to both GitHub and GitLab projects. It enforces branch naming, worktree management, and commit message conventions to produce clean, parseable history across both platforms.

Automated changelogs fail to parse Git history when commit messages lack conventional commit metadata. Enforcing subject length limits, body formatting, breaking change notation, and footers ensures tooling can reliably parse your history.

Conventional commits require strict adherence to type/description patterns, issue numbers, and lowercase-hyphen formatting for branch naming. Deviating from these rules breaks automated parsing and prevents reliable changelog generation.