corvus-review-r2

Multi-pass PR reviews coordinate parallel evaluations across architecture, correctness, security, and conventions, followed by a sequential consolidated polish pass to produce structured findings for large PRs.

A multi-pass code review workflow evaluates a PR sequentially or in parallel across distinct dimensions like architecture and security, needed for large collaborative software projects requiring cross-cut analysis and consistent quality gates.

Structuring code review findings involves generating standardized REVIEW_FINDINGS outputs after evaluating PR passes, facilitating traceability, auditing, and gating across teams by providing clear, consolidated feedback.

Yes, parallel PR review execution allows passes 1 through 3 covering architecture, correctness, and security to run simultaneously, with a final pass 4 polishing step executing sequentially after their completion to ensure timely feedback.

A structured multi-pass review workflow adapts to large or complex collaborative PRs by applying cross-cut analysis, shared context across evaluation passes, and consistent quality gates across codebases to yield high-quality feedback.

Multi-pass PR review orchestration requires shared context across passes to function effectively, and its multi-phase sequencing may introduce overhead for small PRs that do not require cross-cut architectural or security analysis.