corvus-review-r4

Gate PR review progression by validating REVIEW_ACTION before moving to R5.

3|Updated Dec 18, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/NachoFLizaur/corvus --skill corvus-review-r4
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: corvus-review-r4
Source: https://github.com/NachoFLizaur/corvus/tree/main/skill/corvus-review-r4
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/NachoFLizaur/corvus --skill corvus-review-r4

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

PR review gating standardizes how PR feedback is presented and ensures governance by requiring human approval or safe autonomous progression.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Interactive mode presents a full review preview to a user before posting, including a summary of findings and inline comments.
  • Autonomous mode provides a safety rail that auto-posts only when criteria are met, with configurable re-run passes and gate rules.
  • Clear state and decision flow: Step-based interactions, edit/post/save locally options, and rerun controls to refine reviews.

Quick Start

Initiate a PR review in interactive mode to present findings for user approval, or enable autonomous mode to auto-post after validation.

Frequently Asked Questions about corvus-review-r4

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is PR review gating and how does it standardize code review workflows?

PR review gating standardizes how PR feedback is presented by enforcing human approval in interactive mode or safe autonomous progression, requiring a valid review action before proceeding to the next workflow step.

How do I automate PR reviews while maintaining safety rails?

Automate PR reviews by enabling autonomous mode to auto-post only when configured criteria are met, utilizing gate rules and configurable re-run passes to ensure safe validation before posting.

Can I edit or save PR review findings locally before posting them?

Yes, interactive mode presents a full review preview including summaries and inline comments, allowing you to edit, save locally, post, or rerun to refine the review findings before approval.

What review actions are enforced before moving to the next workflow step?

The workflow enforces outputting a valid review action with options for post, edit, local_only, rerun, or auto_post, ensuring clear decision points and state flow before transitioning.

When should I use interactive mode versus autonomous mode for code reviews?

Use interactive mode to present findings for direct user approval before posting, or enable autonomous mode when you need automated auto-posting after meeting configured validation criteria and safety rails.