council

Facilitate multi-round adversarial debates with roles and a final verdict.

7|Updated Oct 20, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/borkweb/skills --skill council-borkweb
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/borkweb/skills/tree/main/skills/core/council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/borkweb/skills --skill council-borkweb

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps users evaluate ideas, plans, and proposals from multiple perspectives, facilitating independent analysis, direct disagreement, and a final verdict.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Assessment: Run a structured adversarial assessment of an idea or plan.
  • Role-Based Analysis: Utilize different perspectives such as Visionary, Devil's Advocate, Ethicist, Pragmatist, Jester, and Domain Expert.
  • Customization: Customize the council with specific lenses and focus areas.
  • Rigorous Debate Protocol: Follow a strict debate protocol with opening positions, cross-examination, and final verdict.

Quick Start

Run the council on the new product idea by providing the idea and specifying the roles and focus areas.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is structured adversarial analysis for idea evaluation?

Adversarial analysis is a structured assessment method that evaluates ideas or plans through multi-round debates using specific roles and lenses, ensuring comprehensive evaluation and a final verdict.

How do I run a multi-round debate protocol to assess a product plan?

Run a plan assessment by providing the idea and specifying roles like Visionary or Devil's Advocate. The debate protocol follows opening positions, cross-examination, and final verdict determination.

Can I customize the perspectives used in an adversarial assessment?

Yes, you can customize the council with specific lenses and focus areas. Standard role-based analysis perspectives include Visionary, Devil's Advocate, Ethicist, Pragmatist, Jester, and Domain Expert.

When should I use a structured council for plan assessment?

Use a structured council when you need to evaluate proposals from multiple perspectives, facilitating independent analysis and direct disagreement to reach a rigorous final verdict on an idea or plan.

Does the debate protocol support cross-examination between different analytical roles?

Yes, the rigorous debate protocol requires strict adherence to phases, enabling direct disagreement and cross-examination between roles before determining a final verdict for the assessment.

What are the limitations of using role-based adversarial analysis for idea evaluation?

Adversarial analysis requires clear roles and strict debate protocol adherence to function. It focuses on comprehensive evaluation through independent analysis rather than rapid, single-perspective feedback.