council

To resolve ambiguous product tradeoffs, convene four distinct voices to surface disagreements and reach a well-justified recommendation. This structured approach extracts the real question and synthesizes diverse opinions into a compact verdict.

Structured adversarial decision-making launches fresh subagents as an Architect, Skeptic, Pragmatist, and Critic. These roles provide diverse perspectives to surface tradeoffs before synthesizing opinions into a final verdict with explicit dissent.

Surface hidden tradeoffs in design and policy choices by applying a compact synthesis workflow that extracts the core question and evaluates it through multiple distinct roles. This process highlights viable paths before delivering a recommendation.

Yes, you can use a multi-role council for strategic product decisions. It applies structured roles and explicit prompts to subagents to rigorously evaluate multiple paths and deliver a timely, well-justified choice.

Avoid using a four-voice synthesis approach for simple decisions with only one viable path. The method requires multiple paths to exist to effectively surface disagreements, tradeoffs, and structured rationale for complex choices.