council

Convenes four distinct subagent voices to synthesize a compact verdict on ambiguous decisions.

Updated Mar 31, 2026

Search Tags:#synthesis #council #decision-making #adversarial #tradeoffs

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/GGEdu/claude-god-mode-template --skill council-ggedu

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/GGEdu/claude-god-mode-template/tree/main/skills/council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GGEdu/claude-god-mode-template --skill council-ggedu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The Council convenes four distinct voices to surface disagreement, tradeoffs, and structured rationale when decisions have multiple viable paths, helping teams reach a timely, well-justified choice.

Core Features & Use Cases

Roles: Architect, Skeptic, Pragmatist, and Critic are launched as fresh subagents to provide diverse perspectives.
Workflow: extract the real question, surface tradeoffs, synthesize opinions, and deliver a compact verdict with explicit dissent.
Use cases: strategic product decisions, policy choices, and design tradeoffs where clarity and rigor are required.

Quick Start

Ask four voices to weigh in on a decision question and synthesize a verdict.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I make clear decisions when facing ambiguous product tradeoffs?▼

To resolve ambiguous product tradeoffs, convene four distinct voices to surface disagreements and reach a well-justified recommendation. This structured approach extracts the real question and synthesizes diverse opinions into a compact verdict.

What is the best way to structure adversarial decision-making for strategic choices?▼

Structured adversarial decision-making launches fresh subagents as an Architect, Skeptic, Pragmatist, and Critic. These roles provide diverse perspectives to surface tradeoffs before synthesizing opinions into a final verdict with explicit dissent.

How do I surface hidden tradeoffs in design and policy choices?▼

Surface hidden tradeoffs in design and policy choices by applying a compact synthesis workflow that extracts the core question and evaluates it through multiple distinct roles. This process highlights viable paths before delivering a recommendation.

Can I use a multi-role council for strategic product decisions?▼

Yes, you can use a multi-role council for strategic product decisions. It applies structured roles and explicit prompts to subagents to rigorously evaluate multiple paths and deliver a timely, well-justified choice.

When should I not use a four-voice synthesis approach for decision-making?▼

Avoid using a four-voice synthesis approach for simple decisions with only one viable path. The method requires multiple paths to exist to effectively surface disagreements, tradeoffs, and structured rationale for complex choices.