council

Orchestrate multi-advisor debates to produce synthesized recommendations with risks.

Updated May 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/haryelramalho/skills --skill council-haryelramalho
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/haryelramalho/skills/tree/main/skills/curated/council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/haryelramalho/skills --skill council-haryelramalho

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you make high-stakes decisions when several expert perspectives need to be weighed at once. It turns a difficult choice into a structured council debate so trade-offs, risks, and hidden assumptions are surfaced clearly instead of being glossed over.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-advisor debate orchestration: Coordinates several archetype subagents through opening statements, rebuttals, concessions, and synthesis.
  • Trade-off analysis: Useful for architecture decisions, tech spec reviews, product dilemmas, and any situation with multiple viable options.
  • Risk-preserving recommendations: Produces a final recommendation while explicitly capturing dissent, unresolved tensions, and mitigation steps.
  • Use case: Ask it to stress-test a proposed PRD or technical design when you want genuine disagreement, not a quick yes-or-no answer.

Quick Start

Ask the council skill to evaluate your decision, include the constraints you care about, and request a recommendation with dissent and risk mitigation.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a structured debate to analyze architecture trade-offs?

To analyze architecture trade-offs, the Skill orchestrates a structured debate among 3-5 archetype subagents, surfacing dissent and producing a synthesized recommendation with risks and mitigation steps.

What is the best way to stress-test a technical design with multiple viable options?

The best way to stress-test a technical design is running a multi-advisor debate that requires selecting archetype subagents to present opening statements, rebuttals, and concessions before synthesizing a recommendation.

Can I use this for product requirement document reviews when I need genuine disagreement?

Yes, you can use it for PRD reviews when you need genuine disagreement, as it applies to product dilemmas and preserves dissent rather than providing a simple yes-or-no answer.

How do I evaluate risk management and hidden assumptions in technology decisions?

You evaluate risk management in technology decisions by coordinating multi-advisor debates that explicitly capture unresolved tensions, dissent, and mitigation steps alongside the final synthesized recommendation.

When do I need a multi-advisor debate for decision-making instead of a standard review?

You need a multi-advisor debate for decision-making when facing high-stakes architecture, technology, or product choices where multiple expert perspectives must be weighed to surface hidden assumptions clearly.

Does this decision-making approach produce a final recommendation or just a list of trade-offs?

This decision-making approach produces a final synthesized recommendation while explicitly preserving dissent, capturing unresolved tensions, and outlining mitigation steps for the identified risks.