council-here

To get multi-perspective critique on a design decision in your current conversation, use an inline council review. It analyzes the live session context rather than a separate file, applying six distinct lenses to the ongoing discussion to surface risks and tradeoffs.

Yes, you can review a live planning discussion without switching to an isolated file diff. This approach evaluates the active work-in-progress directly within the chat session, providing structured feedback on the current decision-making context instead of requiring a separate repository review.

Structured consensus review handles disagreements by preserving explicit recorded dissent rather than forcing false consensus. It evaluates the current plan through multiple lenses and makes tradeoffs visible, leaving the final judgment to the human decision-maker.

During a structured critique of a work-in-progress plan, six specific perspectives are applied: intent, simplicity, cost, realism, user impact, and testability. These lenses ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the design or decision being actively shaped.

You should use inline conversation feedback instead of isolated file review when you need rigorous critique of a design, plan, or decision actively being shaped in chat. It is ideal for live planning sessions requiring immediate, multi-lens evaluation without breaking your workflow.