Council

Coordinate three-round multi-agent debates and output transcripts with recommendations.

28|5|Updated Feb 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jgmontoya/shaka --skill council-jgmontoya
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Council
Source: https://github.com/jgmontoya/shaka/tree/main/defaults/system/skills/Council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jgmontoya/shaka --skill council-jgmontoya

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Structured decision-making often requires multiple expert viewpoints. Council enables simulated debates among specialized agents to surface diverse reasoning and synthesize well-supported conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Three-round debate workflow: initial positions, responses & synthesis with a visible transcript.
  • Configurable council: include or swap members (architect, designer, engineer, researcher) or customize with additional roles.
  • Transcript-driven decision support: yields a formal synthesis and recommended path from the debate, suitable for architecture reviews, product planning, and policy discussions.

Quick Start

Start a topic debate by triggering the Debate workflow to produce a complete transcript and synthesis.

Frequently Asked Questions about Council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a multi-agent debate to support architectural decisions?

You can run a multi-agent debate by triggering the structured debate workflow, which executes a fixed three-round process of initial positions, responses, and synthesis. This produces a complete transcript and a final recommendation for your architectural decisions.

What is a multi-agent debate workflow for decision support?

A multi-agent debate workflow is a structured process where simulated expert viewpoints present arguments, respond to each other, and synthesize conclusions. This surfaces diverse reasoning, risks, and trade-offs to support complex decision-making scenarios.

Can I customize the council composition for design reviews or policy discussions?

Yes, you can configure the council composition by including or swapping members like architect, designer, engineer, and researcher. You can also customize the debate with additional roles to fit design reviews or policy discussions.

What's the best way to surface risks and trade-offs from multiple expert viewpoints?

The best way to surface risks and trade-offs is using a structured three-round debate among specialized agents. This yields a formal synthesis and recommended path by exposing diverse reasoning across expert perspectives in a visible transcript.

Does the debate workflow require any dependencies or external components?

No, the debate workflow requires no external dependencies or components. It operates independently to coordinate multi-agent debates, generate the transcript output, and produce the final synthesized recommendation.