council

Coordinate multi-perspective debates with role-based personas and transcript synthesis.

3|Updated Mar 4, 2026

Search Tags:#collaboration #perspectives #council #debate #transcripts #decision-making

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/jwm-axoni/auggie-pai --skill council-jwm-axoni

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/jwm-axoni/auggie-pai/tree/main/skills/council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jwm-axoni/auggie-pai --skill council-jwm-axoni

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Council-style decision making helps teams surface diverse perspectives through a structured, transcript-backed debate process, reducing bias and increasing the quality of final decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured, multi-perspective debates with named personas (Architect, Designer, Engineer, Researcher)
Round-based discourse, surface insights, and a unified synthesis
Ideal for architectural decisions, product strategy, risk assessment, and design reviews

Quick Start

Prompt the AI to run a three-round council debate with default members and output a synthesis.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I facilitate a multi-perspective debate for architectural decisions?▼

Round-based debate uses role-based personas like Architect, Designer, and Engineer to structure architectural decisions. It generates transcript-backed discourse and a unified synthesis to reduce bias and increase decision quality.

What is a council debate and how does it improve product strategy decision-making?▼

A council debate structures product strategy decision-making by coordinating role-based personas across multiple rounds. It generates transcripts and a unified synthesis output, reducing bias while surfacing structured insights for final decisions.

Can I run a design review debate with default members and output a synthesis?▼

Yes, you can run a design review debate with default members by prompting a three-round council debate. The process generates unified synthesis outputs from named personas, creating a decision-ready record for the review.

Does structured debate transcription work for risk assessment and complex decision-making?▼

Structured debate transcription works for risk assessment by capturing round-based discourse from role-based personas. It documents diverse perspectives and generates a decision-ready synthesis output for complex decision-making scenarios.

What's the best way to surface diverse perspectives when reviewing technical decisions?▼

The best way to surface diverse perspectives is through a structured council debate using role-based personas. Round-based discourse generates transcripts that reveal unified insights, producing a decision-ready record for technical decisions.