council

Coordinates multi-agent reviews for code changes and architecture decisions.

Updated May 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lgzarturo/codeconductor --skill council-lgzarturo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/lgzarturo/codeconductor/tree/main/.agents/skills/council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lgzarturo/codeconductor --skill council-lgzarturo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Multi-agent council for code review and architecture decisions helps teams reach consensus faster, align on design choices, and identify risks early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured council roles: Architect, Security, Product, Delivery, DataOps, and Devil provide specialized perspectives.
  • Decision governance: facilitates architecture reviews, security assessments, and risk-centered discussions.
  • Traceable outcomes: decisions, rationales, and actions are documented.

Quick Start

Provide a code-change summary and request a council review to generate a multi-perspective assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate multi-agent code reviews for architecture decisions?

Multi-agent code reviews coordinate specialized agent roles like Architect, Security, and Delivery to assess code changes and architecture decisions. Structured task routing and guardrails govern collaboration to generate a multi-perspective assessment.

What is a multi-agent council for software design review?

A multi-agent council for software design review applies structured agent roles to evaluate architecture choices, security risks, and delivery impacts. It helps teams align on design choices, identify risks early, and reach consensus faster.

How do I conduct security assessments using multiple agent roles?

Security assessments using multiple agent roles route tasks to specialized agents like Security and Devil to evaluate risks. Decision governance facilitates risk-centered discussions, ensuring security assessments yield traceable outcomes with documented rationales.

Does multi-agent code review support traceable outcomes for decisions?

Multi-agent code review supports traceable outcomes by documenting decisions, rationales, and actions across architecture reviews and security assessments. Versioned contracts and guardrails govern the collaboration to ensure structured decision-making.

What's the best way to structure multi-agent collaboration for code changes?

The best way to structure multi-agent collaboration for code changes is assigning specialized roles like Architect, Product, and DataOps. Task routing directs code-change summaries to the appropriate agents, generating a comprehensive multi-perspective assessment.

When do I need a multi-agent council for architecture reviews?

You need a multi-agent council for architecture reviews when making complex design choices that require consensus across security, product, and delivery perspectives. It facilitates risk-centered discussions and documents decisions for traceable outcomes.