council

Coordinate multi-agent debates to surface blind spots and conflicting viewpoints.

87|15|Updated Mar 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/phaseddd/PhasedddSkill --skill council-phaseddd
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/phaseddd/PhasedddSkill/tree/main/council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/phaseddd/PhasedddSkill --skill council-phaseddd

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The Council solves the problem of single-perspective decision making by orchestrating a team of independent AI agents with distinct personas to engage in real cross-talk debates, surfacing blind spots and friction to illuminate better paths.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Phase-driven council workflow: topic analysis, roster planning, debate rounds, and convergence guided by a Speaker facilitator.
  • Identity-driven roster: diverse, non-derivative personas designed for broad perspective coverage.
  • Real-time debate with cross-talk: direct responses referencing other members and maintaining stance integrity.
  • Use cases include strategic decisions, architecture choices, design directions, or any topic with genuine tension between valid approaches.
  • Leader-driven convergence: explicit options and escalation points to open questions.

Quick Start

Initiate a debate by specifying the topic and requesting a diverse roster of perspectives.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I facilitate a multi-agent debate to surface blind spots in strategic decisions?

A multi-agent debate uses a phase-driven process with an identity-driven roster to surface blind spots and conflicting viewpoints. Agents engage in real cross-talk by directly referencing other members while maintaining their distinct stance integrity throughout the debate rounds.

When do I need a multi-perspective council for decision-making?

You need a multi-perspective council when genuine tension exists between viable options, such as architecture choices, design directions, or strategic decisions. It solves the problem of single-perspective decision making by orchestrating diverse agents to surface friction and illuminate better paths.

How to start a multi-agent council debate for architecture choices?

Initiate a council debate by specifying your architecture topic and requesting a diverse roster of perspectives. A Speaker facilitator then guides the phase-driven workflow through topic analysis, roster planning, cross-referencing debate rounds, and Leader-directed convergence.

Does the multi-agent council workflow support real-time cross-talk between personas?

Yes, the multi-agent council workflow supports real-time debate with cross-talk. TeamCreate and Agent mechanics orchestrate agents to deliver direct responses referencing other members while maintaining stance integrity, ensuring genuine exchange of conflicting viewpoints.

What are the limitations of using a phase-driven debate for decision-making?

The phase-driven debate approach is limited to topics where genuine tension exists between valid approaches. It requires an identity-driven roster and Leader-directed convergence, making it unsuitable for straightforward decisions lacking viable conflicting perspectives or architectural friction.