council

Coordinate cross-model deliberation across frontier models to produce a trusted answer.

27|3|Updated Mar 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rachittshah/llmcouncil --skill council-rachittshah
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/rachittshah/llmcouncil/tree/main
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rachittshah/llmcouncil --skill council-rachittshah

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Orchestrates cross-model deliberation across frontier models to produce robust, trusted answers through structured protocols (voting, debate, synthesis, critique, red teaming, and verification).

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Vote: models answer and anonymously rank each other to determine a consensus.
  • Debate: multi‑round argumentation with optional KS adaptive stopping to converge on a stable view.
  • Synthesize: chairman model merges parallel results into a single authoritative answer.
  • Critique / Red Team: peer review and adversarial testing to surface weaknesses and failure modes.
  • MAV verification: cross-check candidate answers with multiple models for validation.
  • Cost estimation and status/configure: estimate costs and adjust defaults for runs.

Quick Start

Start the MCP server and invoke council_deliberate with your question to begin a multi-model deliberation.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is multi-LLM deliberation and when do I need cross-model verification?

Multi-LLM deliberation coordinates multiple frontier models to produce a single trusted answer through voting, debate, and synthesis. Use it for complex questions requiring consensus, verification, and risk assessment.

How do I run a multi-model council debate using MCP?

Start the MCP server and invoke the council_deliberate function with your question to trigger a multi-model deliberation run. The protocol-driven orchestration handles model coordination and chairman synthesis automatically.

Can I estimate API costs before running multi-model voting and critique protocols?

Yes, the council includes a cost estimation tool to project expenses before executing deliberation runs. You can also adjust default configurations and check status to control multi-LLM orchestration spending.

What is the best way to validate LLM outputs across multiple frontier models?

MAV verification cross-checks candidate answers with multiple models to validate results. You can also apply critique and red teaming protocols for peer review and adversarial testing to surface weaknesses.

Does multi-LLM synthesis support adaptive stopping during multi-round debates?

Debate protocols support multi-round argumentation with optional KS adaptive stopping to converge on a stable view. A chairman synthesizer model then merges the parallel results into a single authoritative answer.

When should I avoid using multi-model deliberation for LLM generation?

Avoid multi-model deliberation for simple queries where single-model responses suffice, as cross-model consensus, voting, and critique protocols introduce higher latency and API costs from orchestrating multiple frontier models.