council-review

Dispatch parallel expert reviews to critique proposals via MCP.

3|2|Updated Mar 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cloga/optimus-code --skill council-review-cloga
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council-review
Source: https://github.com/cloga/optimus-code/tree/main/optimus-plugin/skills/council-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cloga/optimus-code --skill council-review-cloga

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enables parallel expert reviews of a proposal by dispatching multiple specialists to critique from diverse perspectives, accelerating consensus and reducing design risk.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel panels: deploys at least three technical experts plus domain specialists to review a proposal concurrently.
  • Roaster-driven assignment: automatically selects experts based on roster roles and available templates.
  • Asynchronous feedback gathering: collects reviews in a non-blocking fashion and aggregates findings for arbitration.
  • Use Case: A software architecture proposal is stamped for council review, and within hours receives multi-angle feedback on design choices, security implications, and implementation risks.

Quick Start

Dispatch a council for a given proposal and have experts return their reviews for consolidation.

Frequently Asked Questions about council-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get parallel expert reviews for a software architecture proposal?

You can dispatch parallel expert reviews by assigning multiple technical specialists to critique a proposal concurrently, accelerating consensus and reducing design risk. This asynchronous gathering workflow coordinates experts through MCP to collect diverse perspectives.

What is asynchronous feedback gathering for design critiques?

Asynchronous feedback gathering collects reviews from multiple experts in a non-blocking fashion, allowing concurrent critiques from diverse perspectives. It aggregates findings for arbitration, significantly accelerating consensus on design choices and security implications.

How do I set up a roster for parallel architecture reviews?

To set up a roster for parallel architecture reviews, define the required technical roles and available T2 templates. The system automatically selects experts based on these roster roles to deploy at least three technical experts plus domain specialists.

Can I use this for security assessments and design critiques?

Yes, you can use this parallel expert review approach for security assessments and design critiques. It applies to any architectural review where diverse perspectives improve outcomes, deploying domain specialists to evaluate security implications and implementation risks.

Do I need T2 templates and MCP to coordinate expert reviews?

Yes, you need T2 templates and an MCP coordinator to execute this asynchronous gathering workflow. These prerequisites enable the system to automatically select experts based on roster roles and collect non-blocking feedback for consolidation.

Why choose parallel expert dispatch over sequential design review?

Parallel expert dispatch provides multi-angle feedback within hours rather than days, deploying panels of at least three technical experts concurrently. This reduces design risk by accelerating consensus through simultaneous critique of architectural choices.