council-review

Name: council-review
Availability: InStock
Author: Markus

Orchestrate multi-agent council reviews with configurable roles, weighted voting, and consensus detection.

18|2|Updated Dec 12, 2025

Search Tags:#code review #decision making #multi-agent #orchestration #scoring #deliberation

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/markus41/claude --skill council-review-markus41

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council-review
Source: https://github.com/markus41/claude/tree/main/plugins/claude-code-expert/skills/council-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/markus41/claude --skill council-review-markus41

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the process of conducting multi-agent council reviews, ensuring structured deliberation, clear scoring, and efficient decision-making for code and design changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

Protocol Selection: Guides users to choose the most appropriate review protocol (e.g., Red-Blue Team, Six Thinking Hats, Blackboard) based on the nature of the review.
Configuration: Allows for the setup of council members, their weights, and voting thresholds.
Scoring & Decision Making: Provides a robust scoring system and helps in making go/no-go decisions based on review outcomes.
Auto-Fix Integration: Facilitates automated fixes for identified issues with configurable confidence thresholds.
Use Case: Automatically initiate a red-blue-team review for a security-sensitive code change, ensuring all critical aspects are evaluated before merging.

Quick Start

Use the council-review skill to run a /cc-council review for the current code changes.

Frequently Asked Questions about council-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

What is a multi-agent council review for code evaluation?▼

A multi-agent council review orchestrates structured deliberation and scoring for code changes using configurable agent roles, weighted voting, and consensus detection to make go/no-go decisions.

How do I set up a red-blue team review for security-sensitive code changes?▼

You can configure a red-blue team review by setting up council members with assigned weights and voting thresholds to evaluate security-sensitive code changes before merging.

Can I use different deliberation methodologies like Six Thinking Hats for design evaluations?▼

Yes, the review protocol supports multiple deliberation methodologies including Six Thinking Hats, Blackboard patterns, and Red-Blue teaming based on the nature of the design evaluation.

How does automated fix integration work with confidence thresholds during code review?▼

Automated fix integration applies identified fixes during the code review process using configurable confidence thresholds to ensure issues are resolved before finalizing decisions.

What is the best way to make go/no-go decisions on code changes using weighted voting?▼

The best way to make go/no-go decisions is by applying a robust scoring system with weighted voting thresholds and consensus detection across configured council members.

Are there limitations to using consensus detection for multi-agent code reviews?▼

Consensus detection limitations depend on the configured voting thresholds and agent weights, requiring careful setup to ensure accurate decision-making for complex code evaluations.