council-review

Simulate domain expert subagents to review code across security, frontend, backend, Postgres, performance, UI, UX, refactoring, LLM pipeline, and test quality.

51|8|Updated Mar 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SamJHudson01/Carmack-Council --skill council-review-samjhudson01
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council-review
Source: https://github.com/SamJHudson01/Carmack-Council/tree/main/skills/council-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SamJHudson01/Carmack-Council --skill council-review-samjhudson01

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates a comprehensive code review process, identifying potential issues across security, quality, performance, and more, ensuring higher code standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Agent Review: Leverages a council of specialized AI agents (security, frontend, backend, etc.) for deep, domain-specific analysis.
  • Automated Checks: Integrates essential automated quality checks (TypeScript, linting, testing) as a baseline.
  • Prioritized Findings: Outputs a consolidated list of findings, prioritized by severity (P1, P2, P3).
  • Use Case: Before merging a new feature, run this Skill to get a thorough review from simulated experts like Troy Hunt (security) and Martin Fowler (refactoring), ensuring the code adheres to best practices and is free of critical flaws.

Quick Start

Use the council-review skill to perform a code review on the current project files.

Frequently Asked Questions about council-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does multi-agent code review work for security and refactoring?

Multi-agent code review works by simulating domain expert subagents to analyze files for security, refactoring, and quality issues. It assigns files based on domain relevance and outputs prioritized findings to identify potential flaws across your project.

Can I run automated TypeScript linting and vitest checks during an AI code review?

You can run automated TypeScript linting and vitest checks during an AI code review. The process integrates these automated quality checks as a baseline before simulating domain expert subagents to analyze your codebase for deeper security and performance issues.

How do I perform a comprehensive code review before merging a new feature?

To perform a comprehensive code review before merging, run this process on your project files to simulate experts analyzing security, frontend, backend, Postgres, performance, UI, UX, LLM pipeline, and test quality, ensuring adherence to best practices.

What is the best way to prioritize code review findings for Postgres and backend quality?

The best way to prioritize code review findings is to use a multi-agent review that outputs a consolidated list categorized by severity. It assigns files based on domain relevance, producing prioritized findings for Postgres, backend, and other specialized quality areas.

Does AI code review work for evaluating LLM pipeline and UX quality?

AI code review works for evaluating LLM pipeline and UX quality by leveraging a council of specialized simulated subagents. It assigns files based on domain relevance to perform deep, domain-specific analysis across these and other technical areas.