council

Convene four-voice councils to analyze ambiguous decisions with structured disagreement.

Updated Apr 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/thangvawn/agent_financial --skill council-thangvawn
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/thangvawn/agent_financial/tree/main/.cursor/skills/council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/thangvawn/agent_financial --skill council-thangvawn

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The council Skill addresses ambiguity in decision-making by convening four distinct voices to provide multiple perspectives and structured disagreement.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Decision Ambiguity: Offers structured dissent for decisions with multiple credible paths.
  • Tradeoff Surfacing: Explicitly identifies trade-offs and considerations.
  • Multi-Perspective Insights: Provides diverse perspectives from an Architect, Skeptic, Pragmatist, and Critic subagents.
  • Use Case: Ideal for strategic decisions like choosing between monorepo vs polyrepo or deciding whether to ship a feature immediately.

Quick Start

Convene a council for the decision 'Should we ship ECC 2.0 as alpha now, or hold until the control-plane UI is more complete?' by providing the question and relevant context.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get multiple perspectives for ambiguous decisions with no clear winner?

Structured decision-making for ambiguous choices uses a four-voice council of an Architect, Skeptic, Pragmatist, and Critic. This multi-agent approach provides structured dissent to surface tradeoffs and risks for decisions with no obvious winner.

When should I use multi-agent structured analysis for decision-making?

You should use multi-agent structured analysis when facing decision ambiguity with multiple credible paths, such as choosing a monorepo vs polyrepo architecture, where explicit tradeoff analysis and risk consideration are required.

How do I analyze tradeoffs for a strategic decision like shipping a feature immediately?

To analyze tradeoffs for shipping a feature immediately, provide the specific decision question and relevant context to convene the council, which will then evaluate the risks and benefits from four distinct perspectives.

Does multi-agent council decision support work for technical architecture choices?

Multi-agent council decision support works effectively for technical architecture choices by having subagents evaluate strategic decisions like monorepo vs polyrepo, explicitly surfacing considerations and structured disagreement for complex tradeoffs.

What are the limitations of using structured dissent for strategic decisions?

A limitation of using structured dissent is that it is designed specifically for decisions requiring tradeoff analysis with no obvious winner, meaning it may be unnecessary for straightforward choices with a clear optimal path.