Orchestrate up to five expert critics to evaluate a target document in parallel.
npx skills add https://github.com/yxy23/praxis --skill council-yxy23
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: council Source: https://github.com/yxy23/praxis/tree/main/skills/council Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yxy23/praxis --skill council-yxy23
Council enables teams to run parallel expert reviews on a target artifact (paper, plan, decision, or grant) to surface diverse perspectives before finalizing a decision.
Instruct Council to review a target document by providing a file path or inline content and selecting a panel, then run the synthesis to obtain a structured referee-style verdict.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To run parallel expert reviews, you provide a target document via file path or inline content and select a panel of up to five critics. Council dispatches these critics in parallel with fresh context to evaluate the artifact and mitigate conformity bias.
A multi-agent synthesis pass is a separate processing step that weighs insights from parallel expert critics without majority voting. It generates a structured, referee-style verdict to finalize decisions on plans, papers, or grants.
To audit raw critic logs from a parallel document review, you access the durable output generated by the system. Council enforces full invocation logging, preserving both the synthesis section and raw critic logs for auditing purposes.
Yes, you can use a multi-agent panel to review inline content instead of a file path. You instruct Council by providing the inline content directly and selecting a panel, which then evaluates the target document in parallel.
Yes, multi-agent document review enforces hard constraints like persona-file checks for expert critics. This ensures that each of the up to five critics operates within its specified persona during the parallel evaluation of the target artifact.
Documents suitable for multi-agent parallel review include academic papers, plans, decisions, and grants. The system orchestrates up to five expert critics to evaluate these target artifacts in parallel and generates a synthesized referee-style verdict.
yurifrlGuide Go developers through best practices, design decisions, and code reviews without writing code.
loriensleafsCritique decisions through decomposed claims, evidence verification, and adversarial review.
Marwan78888Dispatch plan tasks to fresh subagents with two-stage reviews.
notqueCoordinate ten parallel analyses to extract multi-perspective insights from source material.
