coverage-audit

To perform a curriculum gap analysis, you map your curriculum framework against external statutory or accreditation requirements. The audit classifies matches as direct, partial, indirect, or none to reveal alignment strength and highlight areas needing attention.

Curriculum coverage mapping compares a curriculum framework against external requirement lists to produce requirement-by-requirement coverage tables. It classifies evidence strength to reveal alignment gaps for accreditation preparation and statutory compliance checks.

You generate a CSV coverage report by auditing the curriculum framework against requirement lists. The audit produces Markdown tables, CSV outputs, and summary statistics that detail alignment strength and coverage gaps for curriculum review workflows.

Yes, you can compare curriculum frameworks for accreditation preparation. The audit applies to framework comparison scenarios by mapping structured requirements, classifying evidence, and generating coverage tables and gap summary reports.

Yes, structured requirement mapping is required to perform a curriculum audit. The process depends on comparing structured external requirements against your curriculum framework to classify evidence and generate accurate coverage tables and gap reports.

The best way to prepare for an accreditation compliance check is to conduct a coverage audit comparing your curriculum against statutory requirements. This generates coverage tables and gap summaries, reducing manual document comparison time.