cpm:review

Adversarial review of epic documentation loads the target artifact and applies multiple agent personas to identify gaps, risks, and assumption misalignments. It scores findings by severity and links them to specific stories and acceptance criteria.

Surfacing hidden risks in story-level planning is done through roster-driven critique. Reviewer agents examine story content, acceptance criteria, and dependencies to reveal gaps and produce structured findings with severity scores.

Yes, you can use library and ADR constraints to inform your documentation review. The evaluation process leverages these constraints if present, applying them alongside assigned reviewer roles to examine artifacts and outline issues accurately.

To generate remediation tasks based on epic status, complete an artifact-focused evaluation first. The review process optionally produces standalone or remediation tasks derived from structured findings and the current epic status.

You need an adversarial review for your planning artifacts when you want to challenge assumptions from multiple professional perspectives early. This process helps teams surface misalignments, dependencies, and quality risks before downstream execution.