cpp-coding-standards

Enforce C++ Core Guidelines for C++17/20/23 code review and refactoring.

Updated Jun 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sumeetonline90/fitup_all --skill cpp-coding-standards-sumeetonline90
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cpp-coding-standards
Source: https://github.com/sumeetonline90/fitup_all/tree/main/.cursor/skills/cpp-coding-standards
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sumeetonline90/fitup_all --skill cpp-coding-standards-sumeetonline90

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the problem of inconsistent, unsafe, and unmaintainable C++ codebases that lack adherence to modern best practices, leading to bugs, resource leaks, and technical debt.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • C++ Core Guidelines Enforcement: Implements rules from the official C++ Core Guidelines for C++17/20/23, covering type safety, RAII-based resource management, immutability, and clear code expression.
  • Code Review & Refactoring Support: Provides clear do/don't examples, anti-pattern checks, and a quick reference checklist for writing, reviewing, or modernizing legacy C++ code.
  • Use Case: A team building a high-performance C++ networking service can use this Skill to standardize code, eliminate raw pointer usage, enforce const correctness, and avoid common concurrency bugs.

Quick Start

Use the cpp-coding-standards skill to review your recent C++ class implementation for compliance with the Rule of Zero and const correctness best practices.

Frequently Asked Questions about cpp-coding-standards

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce modern C++ coding standards consistently across my codebase?

You can enforce modern C++ coding standards by applying rules derived from the official C++ Core Guidelines for C++17/20/23, focusing on type safety, RAII-based resource management, and consistent naming conventions throughout your development workflow.

What is the best way to refactor legacy C++ code to use RAII and const correctness?

Refactoring legacy C++ code to RAII and const correctness involves checking for anti-patterns, replacing raw pointer usage with safe resource management practices, and applying immutability by default to eliminate resource leaks and technical debt.

How do I review C++ code for compliance with the C++ Core Guidelines?

Reviewing C++ code for C++ Core Guidelines compliance requires checking existing implementations against clear do/don't examples, verifying Rule of Zero adherence, and using a quick reference checklist to identify common concurrency bugs and unsafe patterns.

Does this approach to C++ type safety work for high-performance networking services?

Yes, applying these C++ coding standards works for high-performance networking services by standardizing code, enforcing const correctness, eliminating raw pointer usage, and preventing common concurrency bugs while maintaining performance requirements.

Why should I use C++ Core Guidelines instead of custom coding conventions?

Using C++ Core Guidelines rather than custom conventions ensures your codebase adheres to idiomatic C++17/20/23 practices, directly addressing type safety and resource management to prevent bugs and reduce technical debt consistently across teams.

What are the limitations of applying C++ Core Guidelines to existing code?

Applying C++ Core Guidelines to existing code may require significant refactoring to replace legacy patterns with RAII-based resource management and immutability, potentially impacting large codebases where unsafe raw pointer usage is deeply entrenched.