Coordinates a five-agent adversarial review of software specifications to surface hidden issues.
npx skills add https://github.com/joshft/correctless --skill creview-spec
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: creview-spec Source: https://github.com/joshft/correctless/tree/main/correctless/skills/creview-spec Command: npx skills add https://github.com/joshft/correctless --skill creview-spec
This skill coordinates a multi-agent adversarial review of a software specification to identify hidden assumptions, gaps, and edge cases that a single reviewer might miss.
Invoke the creview-spec workflow with /creview-spec to start the five-agent adversarial review.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
An adversarial spec review uses five specialized agents including a Red Team and an Assumptions Auditor to analyze a software spec from different perspectives, surfacing hidden gaps and edge cases that a single reviewer might miss.
Multi-agent spec review is designed for high-stakes feature briefs, architecture proposals, or change requests where early validation of robustness and risk identification matters before implementation begins.
Yes, you can automate risk identification by running creview-spec after generating your change request, which coordinates multiple agents to synthesize actionable changes and surface findings in real time.
A multi-agent adversarial analysis covers five perspectives: Red Team, Assumptions Auditor, Testability Auditor, Design Contract Checker, and Upgrade Compatibility Auditor, synthesizing their findings into actionable spec modifications.
No external dependencies are required to run the multi-agent spec review; the workflow operates independently to coordinate the five agents and synthesize their findings with mandatory progress visibility.
The best way to validate testability and upgrade compatibility is using creview-spec, which deploys dedicated auditors to check these specific design contracts and synthesize the results into actionable changes.
loriensleafsCritique decisions through decomposed claims, evidence verification, and adversarial review.
itallstartedwithaideaRefine vague software feature requests into an implementation-ready design brief.
ThanhNguyenDatSimulate a structured peer-review process for design validation using specialized agents.
JDenn0514Analyze specification documents for gaps, ambiguities, and edge cases.
