Implement a custom design facet critique loop from context loading to locked decisions.
npx skills add https://github.com/metedata/design-crit --skill crit-custom
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: crit-custom Source: https://github.com/metedata/design-crit/tree/main/skills/crit-custom Command: npx skills add https://github.com/metedata/design-crit --skill crit-custom
Custom facet critique requires a flexible framework when a project needs evaluation beyond the pre-built facet library. This skill provides a structured crit loop with design-principle guidance, enabling teams to apply rigorous evaluation to domain-specific challenges without prescribing domain knowledge.
Define the current facet in state.json and the project brief in brief.md to initialize a custom facet crit loop.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
A custom design critique loop handles unique project domains by deriving domain knowledge from the project brief, generating divergent design options, and converging feedback into a locked handoff aligned with the design system.
A bespoke design facet crit loop is a structured evaluation cycle for unique design challenges requiring domain-specific criteria. You need it when pre-built critique facets cannot adequately assess the specific requirements of your project domain.
Define the current facet in state.json and outline project requirements in brief.md to initialize the critique cycle. The system loads this context to enforce evaluation criteria, generate options, and present compare views for feedback.
Yes, the custom critique loop integrates with your existing critique pipeline and design system. It uses the project brief and current state to constrain decisions, ensuring the final locked handoff remains fully aligned with established design principles.
The custom critique loop provides the evaluation framework but does not prescribe domain knowledge. Teams must derive and supply the specific domain expertise required to generate and evaluate options for their unique project facet.
The best way to converge divergent options is to use structured compare views to collect targeted feedback iteratively. The critique cycle refines these options against derived criteria until a final design decision is locked for handoff.
october-academyGenerate a unified design system document with color, typography, and component rules.
Imad-OuteWrite UI component specifications with design system tokens and wireframe behavior.
PatkikEvaluate interface designs for UX quality and visual hierarchy.
Owl-ListenerEvaluate design artefacts against intent, principles, and accessibility standards.
