What problem does it solve?
Provides rigorous, structured technical review to catch correctness, security, performance, and design issues that informal reviews and automated linting commonly miss, reducing production incidents and technical debt.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Structured review process with prioritized findings (critical → high → medium → low) and a step-by-step checklist for correctness, quality, and tests.
- Dual operating modes: Debate Mode for challenging architecture and assumptions, and Review Mode for line-level bug detection and concrete fixes.
- Concrete remediation including line references, example fixes, testing recommendations, and rationale for trade-offs; ideal for pull requests, architecture proposals, bug triage, and security audits.
- Example: Use for a PR adding authentication middleware to verify token handling, fix signature verification, and recommend tests for expired and tampered tokens.
Quick Start
Review the provided pull request and return a prioritized list of critical bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance concerns, and concrete code fixes with rationale and test recommendations.