skills.rest
swat9013
swat9013COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

critical-think

Critique AI responses for logical flaws and produce a revised answer.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
Search Tags:#analysis#critique#critical-thinking#self-review#response-improvement#answer-audit
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/swat9013/dotfiles --skill critical-think
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: critical-think
Source: https://github.com/swat9013/dotfiles/tree/main/.claude-global/skills/critical-think
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/swat9013/dotfiles --skill critical-think

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, rigorous critique of a previous AI-generated answer to identify logical flaws, hidden assumptions, and practical risks, then produces a concrete improved response so users can trust the guidance they receive.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Six-section analytical framework: Summarizes the core thesis, evaluates assumptions and context, inspects logical integrity, checks AI-specific pitfalls, assesses risks, and synthesizes an improved proposal.
  • Actionable improvement: Delivers a rewritten, concrete improved answer rather than abstract recommendations.
  • Use Case: Ideal when a user asks "Is this answer correct?" or requests self-review for technical guidance, product decisions, or written communications.

Quick Start

Critically review my previous answer using the six-section framework, list major flaws and assumptions, and provide a concrete improved version ready for use.

Frequently Asked Questions about critical-think

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I critique and improve a previous AI response for logical flaws?▼

To critique an AI response, use a six-section analytical framework that evaluates the core thesis, assumptions, logical integrity, AI-specific pitfalls, and risks, then synthesizes a concrete improved answer.

What is the best way to audit an AI answer for hidden assumptions and risks?▼

The best way to audit an AI answer is to run a structured self-review that inspects logical integrity, identifies hidden assumptions, and checks AI-specific pitfalls to deliver a rewritten improved response.

How do I perform a self-review of generated text for technical guidance?▼

Performing a self-review of generated text involves summarizing the core thesis, evaluating assumptions, and assessing practical risks to yield a concrete improved proposal ready for technical contexts.

Does this critical thinking framework work for product decisions and written communications?▼

Yes, this critical-thinking framework applies directly to conversational workflows, validating generated text and producing improved responses across technical guidance, product decisions, and written communications.

What limitations exist when using a structured critique for answer validation?▼

This structured critique requires an existing AI-generated answer to analyze and focuses solely on identifying logical flaws and AI-specific pitfalls, meaning it cannot validate external facts lacking sufficient context.

Related Skills

Explore More Content & Communication Skills→
Plutonian-coderPlutonian-coder

deep-reasoning

Enforce a six-step reasoning and self-correction workflow for complex tasks.

Community
Intermediate
Im5tuIm5tu
6

using-superpowers

Invoke relevant skills before responding in every conversation.

Community
Basic
abagamesabagames
11

critiquing-own-response

Analyze the preceding response for hidden assumptions, logical gaps, and AI-specific failure modes.

Community
Advanced
sammcjsammcj
155

critical-thinking-logical-reasoning

Analyze written content for logical fallacies, hidden assumptions, and evidence quality.

Community
Basic