critical-thinking

Apply a six-step framework to dissect arguments and detect biases.

18|Updated Feb 8, 2026

Search Tags:#reasoning #critical thinking #bias detection #argument analysis #rationality #logical fallacies

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/goldengrape/skills --skill critical-thinking-goldengrape

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: critical-thinking
Source: https://github.com/goldengrape/skills/tree/main/critical-thinking
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/goldengrape/skills --skill critical-thinking-goldengrape

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, six-step framework to rigorously analyze any text, argument, or speech, ensuring a deep and rational understanding by dissecting its logical structure, identifying biases, and evaluating its credibility.

Core Features & Use Cases

Argument Deconstruction: Breaks down arguments into premises and conclusions.
Credibility Assessment: Evaluates the trustworthiness of claims and sources.
Bias & Fallacy Detection: Identifies cognitive biases and logical fallacies.
Use Case: Analyze a news article to determine the strength of its claims, identify any persuasive tactics used, and assess its overall logical soundness before forming an opinion.

Quick Start

Analyze the provided article using the critical-thinking skill, focusing on identifying logical fallacies.

Frequently Asked Questions about critical-thinking

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I analyze an argument to identify logical fallacies and cognitive biases?▼

To analyze an argument and identify logical fallacies and cognitive biases, apply a six-step critical thinking framework that systematically dissects logical structure, detects rhetorical devices, and evaluates claim credibility.

What is the best way to assess the credibility of claims in news reports and political discourse?▼

The best way to assess claim credibility in news reports and political discourse is using a structured framework to evaluate source trustworthiness, identify persuasive tactics, and detect underlying value judgments.

How do I deconstruct an argument into its premises and conclusions?▼

To deconstruct an argument into premises and conclusions, apply a systematic analytical framework that isolates foundational statements, evaluates their rationality, and maps them to the final conclusions.

Can I use this critical thinking framework to analyze academic papers and advertisements?▼

Yes, you can use this critical thinking framework to analyze academic papers and advertisements, as it systematically dissects arguments, detects rhetorical devices, and evaluates logical soundness across diverse text formats.

What references do I need to evaluate value judgments and rationality in a text?▼

To evaluate value judgments and rationality, you need detailed reference documents for each analytical step to rigorously guide the dissection of arguments and the assessment of cognitive biases.

Why does argument analysis require a structured six-step framework?▼

Argument analysis requires a structured six-step framework to ensure rigorous, rational understanding by systematically breaking down logical structure, assessing credibility, and identifying biases without missing critical steps.