critique

Evaluate user interfaces for usability issues and design quality gaps.

Updated Apr 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AceCandy/ui-skill-visual-compare --skill critique-acecandy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: critique
Source: https://github.com/AceCandy/ui-skill-visual-compare/tree/main/.claude/skills/impeccable/skills/critique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AceCandy/ui-skill-visual-compare --skill critique-acecandy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill turns a subjective design review into a structured UX analysis, helping teams identify usability gaps, visual hierarchy problems, information overload, accessibility risks, and weak interaction patterns before they ship.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Design Quality Assessment: Reviews interfaces for visual hierarchy, composition, typography, color, discoverability, and emotional resonance.
  • Usability Scoring: Produces Nielsen heuristic scores, cognitive load findings, and severity-ranked issues that make tradeoffs easier to prioritize.
  • Persona-Based Testing: Checks the experience through power users, first-timers, accessibility-dependent users, stress testers, and mobile users to surface different failure modes.
  • Automated Anti-Pattern Detection: Combines manual critique with deterministic detection to catch generic AI-style layouts, repetitive patterns, and common UX anti-patterns.
  • Use Case: A product team can use this Skill to review a landing page, dashboard, form, or component and get an actionable critique with specific fixes and recommended follow-up steps.

Quick Start

Use the critique skill to review the selected interface and return the most important UX issues, scores, and prioritized fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about critique

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a structured UX critique on a landing page or dashboard?

A structured UX critique evaluates interfaces using Nielsen heuristic scoring, cognitive load analysis, and persona testing to identify usability gaps. It surfaces severity-ranked visual hierarchy, information architecture, and interaction issues with prioritized fixes for pages, components, or products.

What is heuristic scoring and how does it work for usability reviews?

Heuristic scoring for usability reviews evaluates an interface against established design principles to quantify design quality gaps. It systematically checks visual hierarchy, discoverability, and emotional resonance, producing scores that make tradeoffs easier to prioritize before shipping a product.

Can I use automated anti-pattern detection to find generic AI-style layouts?

Yes, automated anti-pattern detection combines manual critique with deterministic detection to catch generic AI-style layouts, repetitive patterns, and common UX anti-patterns. This process systematically surfaces structural design flaws that reduce usability and visual hierarchy quality.

Does persona-based testing work for accessibility-dependent and mobile users?

Persona-based testing works by checking the experience through power users, first-timers, accessibility-dependent users, stress testers, and mobile users. This surfaces different failure modes and accessibility risks specific to each user group before shipping the interface.

What is the best way to prioritize UX issues identified during a design review?

The best way to prioritize UX issues is using severity-ranked findings from heuristic scoring and cognitive load analysis. This structured approach evaluates usability gaps and information overload to produce prioritized recommendations with specific fixes and follow-up steps for the design team.

When should I not use a heuristic-based design critique?

A heuristic-based design critique may not suit contexts requiring purely aesthetic feedback or brand identity validation. It focuses strictly on usability issues, visual hierarchy, information architecture, and accessibility risks rather than subjective visual preferences or marketing tone.