skills.rest
HAR5HA-7663
HAR5HA-7663COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

critique

Quantify UX issues and generate prioritized Nielsen heuristics reports.

Updated Mar 23, 2026
Search Tags:#accessibility#heuristics#usability#ux#critique#design-review#cognitive-load
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HAR5HA-7663/Claude-Skills --skill critique-har5ha-7663
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: critique
Source: https://github.com/HAR5HA-7663/Claude-Skills/tree/main/critique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HAR5HA-7663/Claude-Skills --skill critique-har5ha-7663

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Evaluate design from a UX perspective to identify visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, emotional resonance, and overall quality with actionable feedback and structured guidance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent, two-assessment workflow (LLM review + automated detection) for triangulated insights.
  • Nielsen's heuristics scoring and prioritized issues with concrete recommendations.
  • Persona-driven observations and anti-pattern detection to inform design iterations.

Quick Start

Initiate the two assessments and synthesize the results into a prioritized action plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about critique

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a UX critique to identify usability and cognitive load issues?▼

Run a UX critique by applying a dual-assessment workflow that evaluates visual hierarchy, information architecture, and cognitive load. It triangulates LLM reviews with automated detection to produce actionable feedback and prioritized design fixes.

What is the best way to score design heuristics for a usability review?▼

Score design heuristics by evaluating the interface against Nielsen's usability principles. The critique process calculates specific heuristic scores, detects anti-patterns, and generates a structured report detailing overall design health.

Can I get actionable design recommendations from an automated UX critique?▼

Yes, automated UX critiques provide actionable design recommendations. The system outputs concrete fixes, persona-driven observations, and suggested implementation commands to directly inform your next design iterations.

How does dual-assessment improve UX issue detection compared to a single review?▼

Dual-assessment improves UX issue detection by combining independent LLM reviews with automated detection. This triangulated approach minimizes blind spots, ensuring a more rigorous evaluation of emotional impact and usability.

When do I need a structured UX critique for my design iterations?▼

You need a structured UX critique when evaluating design quality before iterations. It identifies visual hierarchy flaws, information architecture gaps, and cognitive overload, translating qualitative observations into a prioritized action plan.

Related Skills

Explore More Design & Creative Skills→
rknallrknall
58

UI/UX Design Review

Evaluate UI/UX designs for WCAG 2.1/2.2 accessibility and usability issues.

Community
Advanced
StartaleGroupStartaleGroup
3

critique

Evaluate interactive interfaces for UX flaws and generate structured critique reports.

Official
Advanced
Ikki-GroupIkki-Group

critique

Evaluate web or app designs with Nielsen heuristic scoring and prioritized UX feedback.

Official
Advanced
adperemadperem

critique

Analyze user interfaces to identify usability issues and provide actionable improvements.

Community
Advanced