What problem does it solve? Design reviews are often subjective, inconsistent, and miss systematic issues like AI-generated visual clichés, cognitive overload, and accessibility failures. This Skill provides a structured, repeatable UX evaluation that combines expert design judgment with deterministic automated detection. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Dual Independent Assessments: Runs an LLM design review and a deterministic anti-pattern detector (via npx impeccable) separately to avoid bias, then synthesizes both into one report. - Quantitative Scoring: Scores all 10 Nielsen heuristics (0-4 each, 40 total) with rating bands, plus an 8-item cognitive load checklist and P0-P3 severity tagging for every issue. - Persona-Based Testing: Walks the primary user flow as 2-3 relevant personas (power user, first-timer, accessibility-dependent, stress tester, mobile user) and reports concrete red flags. - Use Case: After building a new dashboard page, run a critique to get a Design Health Score, a list of prioritized issues with concrete fixes, and a recommended sequence of follow-up commands to address them. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to critique the design of your current page or component, for example: "Critique the checkout page and tell me what to fix first."
