critique

Pressure-test documents for logic gaps, assumptions, and missing perspectives.

12|4|Updated Mar 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot --skill critique-mshadmanrahman
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: critique
Source: https://github.com/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot/tree/main/skills/pm-core/critique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot --skill critique-mshadmanrahman

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Pressure-tests product documents to surface logic gaps, unsupported assumptions, missing perspectives, and completeness issues so authors can strengthen decisions before committing engineering or stakeholder resources.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Six-dimension framework: Evaluates logic, assumptions, evidence, completeness, feasibility, and alternatives to give a structured assessment.
  • Prioritized, actionable feedback: Returns strengths plus critical, important, and minor issues with evidence and suggestions for fixes.
  • Workflow integration: Recommended next steps and cross-references to follow-up skills (e.g., PRD revision, user validation, market research).
  • Use Case: Run a pre-launch review of a Full PRD to identify blockers, missing validations, and the highest-risk assumptions to test.

Quick Start

Ask the critique skill to pressure-test my PRD and return strengths, prioritized issues with evidence, and suggested fixes and validation steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about critique

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify logic gaps and unsupported assumptions in a PRD?

A document critique evaluates PRDs, RFCs, and proposals for logic gaps, unsupported assumptions, and missing perspectives. It applies a six-dimension framework to produce prioritized, evidence-backed feedback with actionable suggestions and validation steps.

What is the best way to pressure-test an RFC for completeness and feasibility?

To review a research synthesis for missing perspectives, apply a six-dimension critique framework focused on logic, assumptions, and completeness. This surfaces critical incompleteness issues and generates actionable suggestions with validation steps.

Can I use automated document review for pre-launch OKR validation?

Yes, document critique supports pre-launch OKR validation by evaluating feasibility, assumptions, and completeness. It returns prioritized, evidence-backed issues and recommended next steps to validate high-risk assumptions before committing engineering resources.

Does structured risk analysis work for briefs and product proposals?

Structured risk analysis works for product proposals by pressure-testing documents for logic gaps and feasibility issues. It prioritizes critical problems and provides evidence-backed suggestions to fix incomplete assumptions before stakeholder review.

How do I get actionable feedback on missing perspectives in my product brief?

Document critique provides actionable feedback on product briefs by identifying missing perspectives and logic gaps across six dimensions. It delivers evidence-backed suggestions and validation steps to strengthen proposals before committing resources.