Assess code design quality across five dimensions with evidence and follow-ups.
npx skills add https://github.com/nokusukun/sublime --skill critique-nokusukun
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: critique Source: https://github.com/nokusukun/sublime/tree/main/critique Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nokusukun/sublime --skill critique-nokusukun
Read code and produce a design-quality verdict — whether the concept, names, structure, abstraction level, and interface are right for the problem. Does not produce a diff. Pairs with audit (technical quality) — audit finds what is broken, critique asks whether it is shaped right.
Run {{command_prefix}}critique <path> to obtain a five-dimension design-quality verdict.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Assess code design quality by evaluating whether concepts, names, structure, abstractions, and interfaces align with the problem. A design review produces five-dimension verdicts with evidence and recommended follow-ups, ensuring maintainability before merging or refactoring.
Reviewing code architecture involves judging if the current design is shaped right by examining concept alignment, naming clarity, structural integrity, abstraction fit, and interface usability. This design-quality verdict approach avoids generating diffs and focuses purely on structural improvements.
Code review feedback on naming and structure can be generated without modifying the codebase. A design review partner evaluates concepts, names, structure, abstractions, and interfaces, providing actionable evidence and recommended follow-ups while leaving the original code untouched.
A design-quality critique differs from a technical audit by focusing on whether the code is shaped right rather than finding what is broken. Critique evaluates concepts, names, structure, abstractions, and interfaces, while audit handles technical quality and defects.
Evaluate interface and abstraction fit when a codebase is undergoing review or refactoring to determine if the current design is sound. This assessment checks whether abstractions and interfaces align with the problem and identifies where improvements are needed.
markeriksonDocument coding conventions from configuration files and source code examples.
suwandreApply the Five Whys technique to identify root causes and document findings.
atelier-fashionAudit a codebase with four parallel agents and produce a prioritized health report.
webdriverioEnforce global coding style conventions across codebases during file creation or modification.
