Score UI designs with Nielsen heuristics and prioritized severity issues.
npx skills add https://github.com/riabtsev/viscore_main --skill critique-riabtsev
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: critique Source: https://github.com/riabtsev/viscore_main/tree/main/.github/skills/critique Command: npx skills add https://github.com/riabtsev/viscore_main --skill critique-riabtsev
It helps you evaluate whether a design truly works as an experience by exposing UX, hierarchy, cognitive load, and trust issues that can’t be found by technical checks alone.
Use the critique skill to review a specific page or component by first loading the design context via the frontend-design protocol, then run a UX critique for the target area and return the prioritized issues and recommended fixes.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To run a UX critique, load your design context and target area, then evaluate visual hierarchy and information architecture. The process applies Nielsen heuristics to score usability, test failure modes against personas, and output prioritized severity issues with concrete remediation steps.
AI slop detection identifies template-like, AI-generated design fingerprints by analyzing palette choices, layout patterns, and visual noise. It flags whether a user interface looks fresh or suffers from generic anti-patterns, helping you eliminate visual sameness and improve distinctiveness.
Yes, Nielsen heuristics are applied to score overall design health and quantify usability quality. The evaluation specifically includes executing a cognitive-load checklist and analyzing information architecture to expose hierarchy and trust issues that technical checks miss.
Testing edge cases involves reviewing empty, loading, and error states alongside onboarding, dashboards, and marketing flows. The critique applies persona-based red-flag testing to walk through likely failure modes for relevant personas, calling out specific problematic UI elements.
Prioritizing UX issues involves ranking findings by severity from P0 to P3. The critique outputs quantified scores alongside concrete remediation guidance and suggested next commands, turning design feedback into actionable, prioritized fixes for immediate implementation.
Evaluating a interface for different users requires persona-based red-flag testing across 2-3 relevant personas like power users and first-timers. This approach walks through likely failure modes, calling out specific elements to ensure the design handles varying user needs and contexts.
tomada1114Design ASCII wireframes and UX flows from detailed requirements.
russosalvEvaluate web interfaces for UX issues and generate prioritized P0–P3 remediation commands.
daffy0208Create information architecture, user flows, wireframes, and prototypes for digital products.
thehivegroup-aiEvaluates UI designs against usability heuristics, visual design principles, and accessibility criteria.
