critique

Review proposals and plans to identify flaws, gaps, and risks.

14|6|Updated Feb 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tyevans/tackline --skill critique-tyevans
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: critique
Source: https://github.com/tyevans/tackline/tree/main/skills/core/critique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tyevans/tackline --skill critique-tyevans

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill acts as a devil's advocate, identifying flaws, gaps, and risks in proposals, plans, or findings before you commit to action, preventing costly mistakes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial Review: Challenges assumptions and identifies potential failure points.
  • Flaw, Gap, and Risk Identification: Systematically uncovers issues across various dimensions.
  • Use Case: After drafting a new system design, use this Skill to rigorously test its security, scalability, and feasibility, uncovering potential problems before development begins.

Quick Start

Use the critique skill to identify any flaws or risks in the proposed security plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about critique

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a premortem on a system design before development begins?

A premortem acts as a devil's advocate to identify flaws, gaps, and risks in system designs before you commit to action. It challenges assumptions and rigorously tests security, scalability, and feasibility to prevent costly mistakes.

What is adversarial review and when do I need it for risk assessment?

Adversarial review systematically uncovers issues across various dimensions by challenging conclusions and identifying potential failure points. You need it to stress-test proposals, plans, or findings before committing to action.

How do I identify flaws and gaps in a proposal or plan?

To identify flaws and gaps in a proposal, you provide the structured input for adversarial analysis. The critique process generates structured output with severity ratings for identified issues, highlighting vulnerabilities and missing elements.

Can I use this to stress-test the feasibility of my security plan?

Yes, you can stress-test the feasibility of your security plan using this adversarial review. It systematically challenges assumptions and identifies potential failure points, uncovering security, scalability, and feasibility problems before development starts.

What is the best way to challenge assumptions in a proposed project plan?

The best way to challenge assumptions is through structured adversarial review. This approach requires structured input analysis to identify potential failure points and systematically uncover issues, providing severity ratings for all identified risks.