critique

A multi-lens dialectical critique decomposes a thesis into falsifiable claims organized as a DAG. It applies five orthogonal lenses—STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC—and cross-evaluates them to generate an N×N critique matrix before recursive aggregation into a synthesis report.

Cross-evaluation in argument analysis applies multiple evaluative lenses to a thesis and maps their interactions into an N×N critique matrix. This process reveals logical gaps, evidential weaknesses, scope issues, alternatives, and practical risks through phase-wise synthesis and compression.

You evaluate a thesis by applying orthogonal lenses including STRUCTURAL and EVIDENTIAL critiques. This cross-evaluation process exposes logical gaps and evidential weaknesses while organizing claims into a DAG with stability markers for iterative refinement.

Yes, a DAG-based claim graph supports iterative argument refinement by decomposing a thesis into falsifiable claims with stability markers. It includes convergence checks to ensure phase-wise synthesis and compression maintain analytical rigor throughout the evaluation.

The best way to generate a synthesis report with convergence metrics is to perform cross-evaluation across five orthogonal lenses, producing an N×N critique matrix. Recursive aggregation then compresses this matrix into a compact report complete with protocol references.

No, you do not need external dependencies to run a multi-lens critique. The process relies solely on its internal references to ensure reproducibility, using built-in lenses and DAG-based claim graphs to execute the cross-evaluation and synthesis.