cross-branch-fix-porter

Extract fix intent and re-implement it in a target branch's codebase.

Updated Apr 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ImaginerLabs/skill-manager --skill cross-branch-fix-porter
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cross-branch-fix-porter
Source: https://github.com/ImaginerLabs/skill-manager/tree/main/skills/dev-tools/cross-branch-fix-porter
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ImaginerLabs/skill-manager --skill cross-branch-fix-porter

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps engineers apply a logical bug fix or change from one branch or project to another when direct cherry-pick or copy would fail due to structural, framework, or dependency differences. It focuses on extracting the fix intent and re-implementing that intent in the target codebase rather than copying code verbatim, reducing conflicts and incorrect adaptations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Intent Extraction: Analyze commit diffs or conversation context to summarize the root cause, scope, and core behavioral change introduced by the fix.
  • Mapping & Discovery: Search and locate corresponding files and modules in the target branch, highlighting missing or incompatible dependencies.
  • Decision & Re-implementation: Decide between direct file copy for safe new files and guided re-implementation using the target branch's patterns, producing minimal, style-consistent changes.
  • Reporting & Safety: Generate a migration report with file mappings, applied changes, and items requiring user confirmation before any modifications.
  • Use Case: When a bugfix from a monorepo must be applied to a smaller repo with different utilities and imports, use this Skill to translate intent and produce a patch adapted to the target project's conventions.

Quick Start

Provide the commit or description of the fix, ask the Skill to analyze intent, locate corresponding files in the current branch, and generate a migration report with recommended changes for confirmation.

Frequently Asked Questions about cross-branch-fix-porter

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I port a bugfix to a different branch when cherry-pick fails due to conflicts?

To port a bugfix when cherry-pick fails, extract the fix intent from the original commit and re-implement it in the target codebase. This analyzes the root cause, maps corresponding files, and generates a migration report for confirmation before applying changes.

What is the best way to apply a patch from a monorepo to a smaller repo with different imports?

Applying a patch across incompatible repositories requires intent analysis rather than direct copy. This process translates the fix intent and produces an adapted patch that conforms to the target project's dependencies, utilities, and coding conventions.

When do I need cross-branch code migration instead of a standard cherry-pick?

Cross-branch code migration is needed when repositories have incompatible structures, framework differences, or dependency mismatches. When a logical fix must be re-implemented in the target project's code rather than copied verbatim, intent-based porting prevents incorrect adaptations.

Can I copy files directly during cross-branch porting, or do they always need re-implementation?

Cross-branch porting decides between direct file copy and guided re-implementation. Direct copy is used for safe new files, while guided re-implementation applies the fix intent using the target branch's patterns to ensure minimal, style-consistent changes.

How does intent analysis work when porting fixes across divergent codebases?

Intent analysis works by examining commit diffs or conversation context to summarize the root cause, scope, and core behavioral change of a fix. It maps original files to corresponding target files and highlights missing or incompatible dependencies before patching.

What limitations should I expect when porting fixes across incompatible project structures?

Porting fixes across incompatible structures requires user confirmation before modifying files. The migration report identifies items needing manual review and highlights missing dependencies, meaning automated application is constrained by the target codebase's structural compatibility.