What problem does it solve?
High-stakes decisions like M&A, fundraises, layoffs, and strategic pivots carry single-model bias risk when reviewed by only one AI. This Skill runs the same board memo through multiple model providers and reconciles their disagreements before irreversible commitments.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Multi-Model Review: Sends the memo to Claude, Codex, and Gemini with an adversarial reviewer prompt, collecting independent votes (APPROVE / REJECT / DEFER) and confidence levels.
- Graceful Degradation: Detects available API keys and CLIs, falling back to a Claude-only adversarial mode with three distinct prompt personas when other models are unavailable.
- Structured Consensus Report: Saves a dated Markdown report to ~/.claude/cross-eval/ with vote tallies, consensus and divergent concerns, a GO / PAUSE / STOP recommendation, and open questions for the founder.
- Use Case: Before signing a term sheet, run /cs:cross-eval on the deal memo to surface risks one model may underweight, such as regulatory exposure or technical scale claims.
Quick Start
Run /cs:cross-eval on my fundraise memo to get independent reviews from Claude, Codex, and Gemini with a reconciled GO or PAUSE recommendation.