crypto-audit

To check for cryptographic implementation flaws, an audit reviews algorithm selection, modes, and parameter choices to identify unsafe usage patterns. It detects nonce/IV reuse, validates authenticated encryption, and verifies KDF iteration parameters against OWASP and NIST guidance.

Signature verification vulnerabilities in JWT and webhooks arise from incorrect algorithm handling and non-constant-time comparisons. A crypto audit inspects these verification flows to pinpoint misuse and ensure authentication checks cannot be bypassed or forged.

Auditing AES-GCM encryption involves verifying unique nonce requirements and authenticated encryption usage. The audit checks for nonce/IV reuse patterns and validates MAC-before-decrypt expectations to ensure confidentiality and integrity are maintained.

Yes, this crypto audit reviews TLS configuration and key rotation patterns. It inspects TLS version and cipher posture, evaluates RNG quality, and validates practical key lifecycle correctness to identify exploitable weaknesses in your application.

You need a cryptography implementation review when code uses encryption but exhibits intermittent integrity issues, replay risks, or potential forgery. It pinpoints exact misuses like unauthenticated CBC usage or incorrect JWT verification to produce remediation steps.

Yes, the audit aligns its findings with OWASP and NIST guidance. It checks code against unsafe modes, detects parameterization errors, and produces audit-ready reports detailing exploitable cryptographic weaknesses and required fixes.