csdlc-review

Review sub-agent outputs against acceptance criteria and quality standards.

Updated Apr 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/danhannah94/claymore-plugins --skill csdlc-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: csdlc-review
Source: https://github.com/danhannah94/claymore-plugins/tree/main/csdlc/skills/csdlc-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/danhannah94/claymore-plugins --skill csdlc-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Sub-agent outputs in complex CSDLC workflows often require a consistent, formal review before human stakeholders act. This skill provides an AI Lead-style evaluation against acceptance criteria and quality standards to guard against scope creep and quality gaps.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured checklist: Applies a formal Scope, Quality, Verification, and Acceptance Criteria review to sub-agent outputs.
  • Evidence-driven verdicts: Captures pass/fail with explicit evidence and suggested improvements.
  • Foundry annotation: Writes a review annotation back to the story/doc to facilitate handoffs and async human review.

Quick Start

Initiate an AI Lead review on the given sub-agent output and generate a structured verdict using the built-in checklist.

Frequently Asked Questions about csdlc-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate PR review for sub-agent outputs against acceptance criteria?

You can automate PR review by running an AI Lead evaluation that checks sub-agent outputs against scope, quality, verification, and acceptance criteria. It generates a structured pass/fail report with evidence and suggested improvements.

What is an AI Lead review in the CSDLC workflow?

An AI Lead review in the CSDLC workflow is a formal evaluation of sub-agent outputs against acceptance criteria and quality standards. It guards against scope creep and quality gaps before human stakeholders act.

How do I validate Foundry annotations for design artifacts and implementation stories?

You validate Foundry annotations by applying a structured checklist to design artifacts and implementation stories. The review captures pass/fail verdicts with explicit evidence and writes a Foundry annotation back to facilitate human handoffs.

Can I use this AI review for scope creep and quality gap checks on pull requests?

Yes, you can use this AI review for pull requests. It enforces scope, quality, verification, and acceptance criteria checks on PRs, generating a structured report to guard against scope creep and quality gaps.

Does this automated QA review work without external dependencies?

Yes, this automated QA review works without external dependencies. It operates independently to perform formal scope, quality, verification, and acceptance criteria evaluations on sub-agent outputs.

What's the best way to generate structured pass/fail verdicts with evidence for async human review?

The best way to generate structured verdicts is performing an AI Lead review that captures pass/fail status with explicit evidence and suggested improvements. It creates a Foundry annotation on the story or doc to facilitate async human review.